Why Radio is More Reliable Than Television During Social Protests: An Explanation Through Framing Theory

Francisco Tagle*

*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

This study applies the framing model of Semetko and Valkenburg (2000) to analyze media coverage of the Chilean social protests of 2019, with a particular emphasis on differences between radio and television coverage. This model uses 20 distinct questions to identify specific frames used in news reporting. These findings indicate that the predominant frame across all protest coverage was Attribution of Responsibility, though this frame was even more prevalent for radio. For television, the results suggest a lower focus on the protesters’ demands, with a tendency to portray the events as a political conflict.

Idioma originalInglés
PublicaciónJournal of Radio and Audio Media
DOI
EstadoAceptada/en prensa - 2025

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Broadcast Education Association.

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Why Radio is More Reliable Than Television During Social Protests: An Explanation Through Framing Theory'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto