¿Qué es el aborto indirecto?: La prohibición del aborto y el principio del doble efecto

Alejandro Miranda Montecinos

doi:10.4067/s1726-569x2014000200003

¿Qué es el aborto indirecto? La prohibición del aborto y el principio del doble efecto

Título traducido de la contribución: What is indirect abortion? : The prohibition of abortion and the principle of double effect

Alejandro Miranda Montecinos^*

^*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › revisión exhaustiva

3 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Este trabajo estudia la distinción entre "aborto directo" y "aborto indirecto". El propósito del autor es clarificar el sentido de esta distinción y mostrar que existen argumentos filosóficos sólidos para justificar su relevancia moral. Para lograr este objetivo expone, en primer lugar, el principal argumento esgrimido por quienes consideran el aborto (directo) como un acto intrínsecamente injusto; en segundo, muestra cuál es el origen histórico de la distinción entre aborto directo y aborto indirecto; en tercero, presenta un argumento para defender la relevancia moral de esta distinción y, finalmente, explica el modo en que ella opera, usando como ejemplo el análisis de T. L. Bouscaren sobre la salpingectomía de una trompa con feto ectópico.

Título traducido de la contribución	What is indirect abortion? : The prohibition of abortion and the principle of double effect
Idioma original	Español
Páginas (desde-hasta)	159-168
Número de páginas	10
Publicación	Acta Bioethica
Volumen	20
N.º	2
DOI	https://doi.org/10.4067/s1726-569x2014000200003
Estado	Publicada - 2014

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Organizacion Panamericana de la Salud. All rights reserved.

Palabras clave

Direct abortion
Indirect abortion
Principle of double effect

Acceder al documento

10.4067/s1726-569x2014000200003

Otros archivos y enlaces

Enlace a la publicación en Scopus

Citar esto

@article{f1571d8a348344848b04cef3fa391eb4,

title = "¿Qu{\'e} es el aborto indirecto?: La prohibici{\'o}n del aborto y el principio del doble efecto",

abstract = "This paper study the distinction between “direct abortion” and “indirect abortion”. The purpose of the author is to clarify the meaning of the distinction and to show that there are solid philosophical arguments to justify moral relevance. In order to achieve this goal, first, the main argument expressed by those who consider abortion (direct) as an act intrinsically unfair is exposed; second, the historical origin of the distinction between direct and indirect abortion is shown; third, an argument defending the moral relevance of this distinction is presented; and, finally, the way it operates is explained by the analysis of T. L. Bouscaren about salpingectomy of a fallopian tube with ectopic fetus.",

keywords = "Direct abortion, Indirect abortion, Principle of double effect",

author = "{Miranda Montecinos}, Alejandro",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.4067/s1726-569x2014000200003",

language = "Spanish",

volume = "20",

pages = "159--168",

journal = "Acta Bioethica",

issn = "0717-5906",

publisher = "Organizacion Panamericana de la Salud",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ¿Qué es el aborto indirecto?

T2 - La prohibición del aborto y el principio del doble efecto

AU - Miranda Montecinos, Alejandro

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - This paper study the distinction between “direct abortion” and “indirect abortion”. The purpose of the author is to clarify the meaning of the distinction and to show that there are solid philosophical arguments to justify moral relevance. In order to achieve this goal, first, the main argument expressed by those who consider abortion (direct) as an act intrinsically unfair is exposed; second, the historical origin of the distinction between direct and indirect abortion is shown; third, an argument defending the moral relevance of this distinction is presented; and, finally, the way it operates is explained by the analysis of T. L. Bouscaren about salpingectomy of a fallopian tube with ectopic fetus.

AB - This paper study the distinction between “direct abortion” and “indirect abortion”. The purpose of the author is to clarify the meaning of the distinction and to show that there are solid philosophical arguments to justify moral relevance. In order to achieve this goal, first, the main argument expressed by those who consider abortion (direct) as an act intrinsically unfair is exposed; second, the historical origin of the distinction between direct and indirect abortion is shown; third, an argument defending the moral relevance of this distinction is presented; and, finally, the way it operates is explained by the analysis of T. L. Bouscaren about salpingectomy of a fallopian tube with ectopic fetus.

KW - Direct abortion

KW - Indirect abortion

KW - Principle of double effect

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908571799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4067/s1726-569x2014000200003

DO - 10.4067/s1726-569x2014000200003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84908571799

SN - 0717-5906

VL - 20

SP - 159

EP - 168

JO - Acta Bioethica

JF - Acta Bioethica

IS - 2

ER -