Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Comprehensive Survey of Recognition, Training, and Practice

  • Leonor Victoria González-Pérez
  • , Cristina Saldivia-Siracusa
  • , Ana Carolina Prado Ribeiro e Silva
  • , Lady Paola Aristizábal Arboleda
  • , Karen Patricia Domínguez Gallagher
  • , Anna Luiza Damaceno Araújo
  • , Pablo Agustin Vargas
  • , María Luisa Paparella
  • , Ana Verónica Ortega Pinto
  • , Wilfredo Alejandro González-Arriagada
  • , Claudia Patricia Peña-Vega
  • , Roberto Gerber-Mora
  • , Gilda Lucia García Heredia
  • , Florence Juana Maria Cuadra Zelaya
  • , Ileana del Rosario Hurtado Castillo
  • , Arvind Babu Rajendra Santosh
  • , Adalberto Mosqueda-Taylor
  • , Erick Antonio Castillo Gurdián
  • , María del Carmen González Galván
  • , Wilson Delgado Azañero
  • Helen Rivera, Ronell Bologna-Molina, Mariana Villarroel-Dorrego, Janeth Liliam Flores Ramos, Carlos Alberto Gaidos Nates, Patricia Reiván Ortiz, Claudette Arambu Turcios, Erick Martínez Cruz, Loyden Evan Ken, Keith D. Hunter, Alan Roger Santos-Silva*
*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: Oral and maxillofacial pathology (OMFP) is a dental specialty that studies the causes, processes, and effects of diseases in the oral and maxillofacial area, while also contributing to diagnosis and treatment. Its recognition, training, and professional practice vary across the globe. This study aimed to explore the training and professional development of OMFP in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), including important issues such as specialty recognition, service regulation, postgraduate education, number of specialists, career opportunities, and perceived barriers. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted, where senior professionals in OMFP from 21 LAC countries were invited to complete a self-administered questionnaire via the REDCap web platform. Results: Experts from 21 countries reported recognition of OMFP as a dental specialty in 76.2% of the countries, with 61.9% offering it as an independent program distinct from oral medicine. Specific regulations for practice were present in 52.4% of the countries, and 33.3% offered postgraduate programs, mainly combining other specialties. The professional activities of participants were diverse, including roles in private practice, universities, research, laboratories, and hospitals. However, 61.9% of participants identified the lack of recognition for multidisciplinary teams as a significant barrier to their practice. Conclusion: This groundbreaking study provides an overview of key aspects of training, practice, and recognition of OMFP in 21 LAC countries. The findings demonstrate significant variation both within the region and when compared to global studies, providing a crucial foundation for future research in this area.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)1001-1011
Número de páginas11
PublicaciónJournal of Oral Pathology and Medicine
Volumen54
N.º10
DOI
EstadoPublicada - nov 2025

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

  1. ODS 3: Salud y bienestar
    ODS 3: Salud y bienestar

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Comprehensive Survey of Recognition, Training, and Practice'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto