TY - JOUR
T1 - National sovereignty deference. national margin of appreciation doctrine and practice in the inter-American human rights system
T2 - National sovereignty deference. National margin of appreciation doctrine and practice in the inter-American human rights system
AU - Contreras, Édgar Hernán Fuentes
AU - Cárdenas-Contreras, Luz Eliyer
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Nowadays, it is difficult to argue that the inclusion of the doctrine national margin of appreciation is an exclusive matter of the European System of Human Rights Protection. On the contrary, the direct or indirect use of this doctrine by the Inter-American Human Rights System opens a space for discussion about its understanding and development, going beyond the conceptual mention of this category. In this sense, this article seeks to examine, from an exploratory methodology, the application parameters of the national margin of appreciation within the context of the latter regional protection system, between 1981-2020. To do this exercise, this article has four sections. It starting with a conceptual framework in order to move on to the methodology section and its respective results.The article ends prior to the conclusions, with the understanding observations of the margin of national appreciation category.
AB - Nowadays, it is difficult to argue that the inclusion of the doctrine national margin of appreciation is an exclusive matter of the European System of Human Rights Protection. On the contrary, the direct or indirect use of this doctrine by the Inter-American Human Rights System opens a space for discussion about its understanding and development, going beyond the conceptual mention of this category. In this sense, this article seeks to examine, from an exploratory methodology, the application parameters of the national margin of appreciation within the context of the latter regional protection system, between 1981-2020. To do this exercise, this article has four sections. It starting with a conceptual framework in order to move on to the methodology section and its respective results.The article ends prior to the conclusions, with the understanding observations of the margin of national appreciation category.
KW - Deference
KW - Human rights
KW - Inter-American Human Rights System
KW - Margin of appreciation
KW - Sovereignty
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5cc9be11-95c3-380b-95de-630aad3ac4b3/
U2 - 10.22201/iij.24487872e.2021.21.15592
DO - 10.22201/iij.24487872e.2021.21.15592
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85104928441
SN - 1870-4654
VL - 21
SP - 197
EP - 231
JO - Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional
JF - Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional
ER -