Meditación, historia, contención. Heidegger y la reformulación ontohistórica de la aleteiología

Alejandro G. Vigo*

*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo de revisiónrevisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

This essay presents an overview of the way in which the «turn» (Kehre) towards ontohistorical thought, in the mid-30s, impacts on the aletheiological conception that, following E. Lask and E. Husserl, Heidegger elaborates from the beginning of the 1920s to Sein und Zeit. On this basis, an attempt is also made to characterize the eventualist-kairological reformulation of aletheiology presented in Beiträge zur Philosophie. The proposed characterization is carried out according to the distinction between a metahistorical level of consideration, which corresponds to the attempt to think of being in its truth in terms of the notion of «event» (Ereignis), and a properly historical level of consideration, which corresponds to the «hermeneutics of the two beginnings». The thought that historically meditates Being in its truth can only be faithful to the intrinsic mobility of Being itself, if it is exercised in and from the stillness of restraint, as a fundamental mood.
Título traducido de la contribuciónMeditation, history, containment. Heidegger and the ontohistorical reformulation of aletheiology
Idioma originalEspañol
Páginas (desde-hasta)45-74
Número de páginas30
PublicaciónClaridades
Volumen12
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2 sept. 2020
Publicado de forma externa

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Fonseca Journal of Communication.

Palabras clave

  • Aletheiology
  • Enowning
  • History of being
  • Kairology
  • Restraint

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Meditación, historia, contención. Heidegger y la reformulación ontohistórica de la aleteiología'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto