Resumen
In this monograph we examine the extent to which word-of-mouth communication (WOM) plays a complementary and/or substitute role with regard to advertising. A review of the existing literature reveals the main similarities and differences between these constructs. We also examine the conditions in which a social contagion process is most likely. Specifically, our literature review helps us answer the following questions: whetherWOM complements the advertising effect, when and how WOM can be a substitute of the marketing effort, and which issues limit WOM's ability to inform and persuade consumers. Published empirical evidence suggests that in most cases WOM complements advertising; however, three marketing strategies - viral marketing, referral reward programs, and a firm's creation of exogenous WOM - might work without advertising. This monograph concludes with a list of unanswered questions of potential interest to both researchers and managers.
| Idioma original | Inglés |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 1-53 |
| Número de páginas | 53 |
| Publicación | Foundations and Trends in Marketing |
| Volumen | 5 |
| N.º | 1 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 2010 |
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Marketing expenditures and word-of-mouth communication: Complements or substitutes?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver