TY - JOUR
T1 - Literacy Clinics During COVID-19: Voices that Envision the Future
AU - Laster, Barbara
AU - Butler, Melinda
AU - Waller, Rachael
AU - Vasinda, Sheri
AU - Hoch, Mary
AU - Orellana, Pelusa
AU - Rhodes, Joan
AU - Deeney, Theresa
AU - Scott, D. Beth
AU - Gallagher, Tiffany
AU - Cavendish, Leslie
AU - Milby, Tammy
AU - Rogers, Rebecca
AU - Johnson, Tracy
AU - Msengi, Shadrack
AU - Dozier, Cheryl
AU - Huggins, Shelly
AU - Gurvitz, Debra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022/11/9
Y1 - 2022/11/9
N2 - The resiliency of literacy clinics was tested during 2020–2021, as many pivoted from in-person (F2F) to online or 3-way remote learning because of the COVID-19 pandemic. University-based literacy clinics advance teacher education, provide services to K-12 students who may need instructional support, and are a laboratory for research. The purpose of the study was to examine modifications in literacy instruction and assessment as a consequence of the changes in modality. Participants (n = 58) were literacy clinic directors/instructors from multiple states and countries. Data were analyzed in three phases: researchers individually coded; multiple teams cross-checked; a macro team collated across themes. Alterations during the pandemic involved place, time, types of texts, innovative instructional tools, and new ways of operationalizing literacy assessment and instruction. Some clinics used technology to transform instruction and innovate, while for others the goal was to replicate existing practices. Teachers, students in the context of their families, and teacher educators demonstrated resiliency, resourcefulness, and creativity in the face of interruptions and stress. Findings, viewed through the lens of the TPACK framework, can help us understand how transformations in instruction and assessment affect literacy learning not only in the context of clinics, but in school classrooms as well.
AB - The resiliency of literacy clinics was tested during 2020–2021, as many pivoted from in-person (F2F) to online or 3-way remote learning because of the COVID-19 pandemic. University-based literacy clinics advance teacher education, provide services to K-12 students who may need instructional support, and are a laboratory for research. The purpose of the study was to examine modifications in literacy instruction and assessment as a consequence of the changes in modality. Participants (n = 58) were literacy clinic directors/instructors from multiple states and countries. Data were analyzed in three phases: researchers individually coded; multiple teams cross-checked; a macro team collated across themes. Alterations during the pandemic involved place, time, types of texts, innovative instructional tools, and new ways of operationalizing literacy assessment and instruction. Some clinics used technology to transform instruction and innovate, while for others the goal was to replicate existing practices. Teachers, students in the context of their families, and teacher educators demonstrated resiliency, resourcefulness, and creativity in the face of interruptions and stress. Findings, viewed through the lens of the TPACK framework, can help us understand how transformations in instruction and assessment affect literacy learning not only in the context of clinics, but in school classrooms as well.
KW - Clinical research and practice
KW - digital literacies
KW - instructional strategies and materials
KW - teacher education
UR - https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2134064
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85141831325&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/d391a6e5-6611-3122-a195-2f0d6f8fe942/
U2 - 10.1080/19388071.2022.2134064
DO - 10.1080/19388071.2022.2134064
M3 - Article
SN - 1938-8071
JO - Literacy Research and Instruction
JF - Literacy Research and Instruction
ER -