La Sentencia Judicial Como Medio De Prueba

Alejandro Romero Seguel*

*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

9 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This study explains the possibilities of evidence that a fi nal and enforceable verdict has on the Chilean civil process. As a proceeding, the court's decision constitutes a legal and material reality that can help to prove a fact in a subsequent lawsuit, particularly in relation to the refl ex effect of the verdict to the meaning "ultra parties" of this desition and the value that a judicial sentence has in the production system of judicial precedents. This last statement takes place when a court's decision creates a doctrine on a particular subject or develop a contradiction with previous decisions. Both cases will require legal test of that fact, in order that the Supreme Court can unify the legal doctrine with the object that the courts can resolve with the same rule similar lawsuits.

Título traducido de la contribuciónThe veredict as evidence
Idioma originalEspañol
Páginas (desde-hasta)251-276
Número de páginas26
PublicaciónRevista Chilena de Derecho
Volumen39
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublicada - ago 2012

Palabras clave

  • Equality before the law
  • Evidence
  • Judicial discrimination
  • Nullity of a sentence
  • Precedent
  • Precedents unification

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'La Sentencia Judicial Como Medio De Prueba'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto