La más verdadera tragedia: conciliación y antagonismo en las Leyes de Platón

José Antonio Giménez Salinas*

*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

This paper examines the quarrel with the tragic poets in Laws, VII 817b-d, by emphasizing, on the one hand, fundamental differences with the more famous quarrel of the Republic, and by arguing, on the other hand, for a strong (and not merely rhetorical) reading of the central claim of the passage, namely, that the very political constitution proposed in the dialogue is itself the “truest tragedy.” Assuming this perspective, I show that the constitution of Magnesia is the best possible tragedy insofar as it makes possible the greatest realization of the community’s life, recognizing, appealing to, and integrating human passions and weaknesses within itself. We are confronted with a notion of tragedy that, while recognizing as its starting point the antagonism proper to the tragic genre, aspires to common happiness as the most beautiful culmination of the human drama.

Título traducido de la contribuciónThe Truest Tragedy: Conciliation and Antagonism in Plato’s Laws
Idioma originalEspañol
Páginas (desde-hasta)11-39
Número de páginas29
PublicaciónTopicos (Mexico)
N.º72
DOI
EstadoPublicada - may. 2025

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Universidad Panamericana. All rights reserved.

Palabras clave

  • ancient quarrel between philosophy and poetry
  • Laws
  • mimesis
  • tragedy

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'La más verdadera tragedia: conciliación y antagonismo en las Leyes de Platón'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto