Resumen
In the 4th century BC, Aristotle addressed the difference between (Greek passag) (negligence) and (Greek passag) (wrongdoing). Consequently, he distinguishes between voluntary and involuntary acts so as to arrive at such reasoning 200 years before Roman jurists did. Although it is true that it is not possible to affirm an equivalent relationship between negligence, as it was conceived in the Greek world, with the thought of Roman jurisconsultants, it is possible to find the trace, the germ or essence of strict negligence, particularly in the treatment of involuntary acts.
| Título traducido de la contribución | Aristotle⇔s ethics in the evolution of the legal negligence: A review about foreseeability |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 421-442 |
| Número de páginas | 22 |
| Publicación | Problema |
| N.º | 15 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - ene. 2021 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.
Palabras clave
- Aristotle
- Fault
- Foreseeability
- Negligence
- Wrongdoing
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'La ética de Aristóteles en la evolución de la culpa jurídica. Una revisión a propósito de la previsibilidad'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver