TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility and Safety of 1.1-mm Cryobiopsy for Acute Rejection Surveillance in Lung Transplant Recipients
T2 - A Comparative Study and Review of the Literature
AU - Barrios-Ruiz, Alanna
AU - Yu Lee-Mateus, Alejandra
AU - Vaca-Cartagena, Bryan F.
AU - Gutierrez-Gallegos, Paola
AU - Funes-Ferrada, Rodrigo
AU - Balasubramanian, Prasanth
AU - Khoor, Andras
AU - Shah, Sadia Z.
AU - Alvarez, Francisco G.
AU - Baz, Maher
AU - Narula, Tathagat
AU - Bag, Remzi
AU - Robertson, Kelly S.
AU - Fernandez-Bussy, Sebastian
AU - Abia-Trujillo, David
N1 - Copyright © 2026 Alanna Barrios-Ruiz et al. Pulmonary Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2026
Y1 - 2026
N2 - BACKGROUND: Identifying graft rejection after lung transplantation remains challenging, and no consensus exists on the optimal surveillance strategy. Transbronchial forceps biopsy (FBx) is the conventional method but is limited by small sample size and crush artifacts. Sheath-guided cryobiopsy (CBx) using a novel 1.1-mm probe has emerged as a promising alternative. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of the 1.1-mm cryoprobe and provides a focused review of current literature.METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational single-center study between October 2022 and January 2023 of adult lung transplant recipients who underwent transbronchial biopsies for surveillance. Procedures were performed using either standard FBx or the 1.1-mm cryoprobe. Descriptive analyses compared feasibility and safety between groups.RESULTS: We identified 72 lung transplant recipients who underwent 109 surveillance biopsies. A total of n = 56 CBx and n = 53 FBx procedures were performed. The median procedure time was 20 min (IQR 17-26) in the CBx group versus 22 min (IQR 15-33) in the FBx group. We found a statistically higher median sample area for CBx compared with FBx (11 vs. 6 mm
2, p < 0.01). No pneumothorax or postprocedural respiratory failure occurred in either group.
CONCLUSION: CBx with a 1.1-mm probe provides larger histological samples than FBx, with comparable safety and potentially shorter procedural times. These findings support its feasibility for lung transplant surveillance.
AB - BACKGROUND: Identifying graft rejection after lung transplantation remains challenging, and no consensus exists on the optimal surveillance strategy. Transbronchial forceps biopsy (FBx) is the conventional method but is limited by small sample size and crush artifacts. Sheath-guided cryobiopsy (CBx) using a novel 1.1-mm probe has emerged as a promising alternative. This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of the 1.1-mm cryoprobe and provides a focused review of current literature.METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational single-center study between October 2022 and January 2023 of adult lung transplant recipients who underwent transbronchial biopsies for surveillance. Procedures were performed using either standard FBx or the 1.1-mm cryoprobe. Descriptive analyses compared feasibility and safety between groups.RESULTS: We identified 72 lung transplant recipients who underwent 109 surveillance biopsies. A total of n = 56 CBx and n = 53 FBx procedures were performed. The median procedure time was 20 min (IQR 17-26) in the CBx group versus 22 min (IQR 15-33) in the FBx group. We found a statistically higher median sample area for CBx compared with FBx (11 vs. 6 mm
2, p < 0.01). No pneumothorax or postprocedural respiratory failure occurred in either group.
CONCLUSION: CBx with a 1.1-mm probe provides larger histological samples than FBx, with comparable safety and potentially shorter procedural times. These findings support its feasibility for lung transplant surveillance.
KW - Adult
KW - Biopsy/methods
KW - Bronchoscopy/methods
KW - Cryosurgery/methods
KW - Feasibility Studies
KW - Female
KW - Graft Rejection/diagnosis
KW - Humans
KW - Lung Transplantation/adverse effects
KW - Lung/pathology
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Retrospective Studies
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035820184
U2 - 10.1155/pm/3558336
DO - 10.1155/pm/3558336
M3 - Review article
C2 - 41982166
AN - SCOPUS:105035820184
SN - 2090-1836
VL - 2026
JO - Pulmonary Medicine
JF - Pulmonary Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 3558336
ER -