Fake news and the first amendment: Reconciling a disconnect between theory and doctrine

Clay Calvert, Stephanie Mcneff, Austin Vining, Sebastian Zarate

Resultado de la investigación: Contribución a una revistaArtículo de revisiónrevisión exhaustiva

3 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This Article analyzes calls for regulating so-called "fake news" through the lens of both traditional theories of free expression - namely, the marketplace of ideas and democratic selfgovernance - and two well-established First Amendment doctrines, strict scrutiny and underinclusivity. The Article argues there is, at first glance, a seeming disconnect between theory and doctrine when it comes to either censoring or safeguarding fake news. The Article contends, however, that a structural rights interpretation of the First Amendment offers a viable means of reconciling theory and doctrine. A structural rights approach focuses on the dangers of collective power in defining the truth, rather than on the benefits that messages provide to society or individuals. Ultimately, a structural rights conception illustrates why, at the level of free speech theory, the government must not censor fake news.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)99-138
Número de páginas40
PublicaciónUniversity of Cincinnati Law Review
Volumen86
N.º1
EstadoPublicada - 2018
Publicado de forma externa

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 University of Cincinnati College of Law. All rights reserved.

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Fake news and the first amendment: Reconciling a disconnect between theory and doctrine'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto