Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Expert perspectives on global biodiversity loss and its drivers and impacts on people

  • Forest Isbell*
  • , Patricia Balvanera
  • , Akira S. Mori
  • , Jin Sheng He
  • , James M. Bullock
  • , Ganga Ram Regmi
  • , Eric W. Seabloom
  • , Simon Ferrier
  • , Osvaldo E. Sala
  • , Nathaly R. Guerrero-Ramírez
  • , Julia Tavella
  • , Daniel J. Larkin
  • , Bernhard Schmid
  • , Charlotte L. Outhwaite
  • , Pairot Pramual
  • , Elizabeth T. Borer
  • , Michel Loreau
  • , Taiwo Crossby Omotoriogun
  • , David O. Obura
  • , Maggie Anderson
  • Cristina Portales-Reyes, Kevin Kirkman, Pablo M. Vergara, Adam Thomas Clark, Kimberly J. Komatsu, Owen L. Petchey, Sarah R. Weiskopf, Laura J. Williams, Scott L. Collins, Nico Eisenhauer, Christopher H. Trisos, Delphine Renard, Alexandra J. Wright, Poonam Tripathi, Jane Cowles, Jarrett E.K. Byrnes, Peter B. Reich, Andy Purvis, Zati Sharip, Mary I. O’Connor, Clare E. Kazanski, Nick M. Haddad, Eulogio H. Soto, Laura E. Dee, Sandra Díaz, Chad R. Zirbel, Meghan L. Avolio, Shaopeng Wang, Zhiyuan Ma, Jingjing Liang, Hanan C. Farah, Justin Andrew Johnson, Brian W. Miller, Yann Hautier, Melinda D. Smith, Johannes M.H. Knops, Bonnie J.E. Myers, Zuzana V. Harmáčková, Jorge Cortés, Michael B.J. Harfoot, Andrew Gonzalez, Tim Newbold, Jacqueline Oehri, Marina Mazón, Cynnamon Dobbs, Meredith S. Palmer
*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

209 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Despite substantial progress in understanding global biodiversity loss, major taxonomic and geographic knowledge gaps remain. Decision makers often rely on expert judgement to fill knowledge gaps, but are rarely able to engage with sufficiently large and diverse groups of specialists. To improve understanding of the perspectives of thousands of biodiversity experts worldwide, we conducted a survey and asked experts to focus on the taxa and freshwater, terrestrial, or marine ecosystem with which they are most familiar. We found several points of overwhelming consensus (for instance, multiple drivers of biodiversity loss interact synergistically) and important demographic and geographic differences in specialists’ perspectives and estimates. Experts from groups that are underrepresented in biodiversity science, including women and those from the Global South, recommended different priorities for conservation solutions, with less emphasis on acquiring new protected areas, and provided higher estimates of biodiversity loss and its impacts. This may in part be because they disproportionately study the most highly threatened taxa and habitats. Front Ecol Environ 2022;.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)94-103
Número de páginas10
PublicaciónFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Volumen21
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublicada - mar. 2023
Publicado de forma externa

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America.

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

  1. ODS 14: Vida submarina
    ODS 14: Vida submarina
  2. ODS 15: Vida de ecosistemas terrestres
    ODS 15: Vida de ecosistemas terrestres

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Expert perspectives on global biodiversity loss and its drivers and impacts on people'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto