Resumen
This paper presents a study about the special legislative procedure for peace, popularly known as fast track, and its role in the Colombian political transition. This study faces the interpretation that the fast track was an ineffective mechanism for the legislative implementation of the Peace Agreement, and attempts to explain this through two points of analysis. First, it presents the difficulty of implementing the constitutional amendments that the Agreement needed without activating the constituent power, which made it necessary to make the Constitution more flexible in order to integrate the pillars of the Agreement into the Constitution. Second, it explores the concept of constitutional aporia, that is the logical difficulty of reform the constitution through the categories of original and derived constituent power, and their consequences on the rigidity and flexibility of the Constitution.
| Título traducido de la contribución | The “fast track”: A flexibilizations mechanism of the 1991 political constitution? |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 3-29 |
| Número de páginas | 27 |
| Publicación | Revista Derecho del Estado |
| N.º | 48 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 7 dic. 2020 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2020 Universidad Externado de Colombia. All rights reserved.
Palabras clave
- Constituted power and constituted power
- Constitutional amendments
- Fast track
- Legislative procedure
- Peace Agreement
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'El “fast track”: ¿un mecanismo de flexibilización de la Constitución de 1991?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver