Resumen
Article 36 bis of the Public Works Concessions Law grants the parties a right of choice to select which is the competent Court —the Court of Appeals of Santiago or the Arbitral Commission— to adjudicate any disputes or claims arising from the interpretation, application, or execution of the concession contract. Once the Arbitral Commission of the concession contract is established and the procedural rules are agreed upon, the parties designate the Arbitral Commission as the natural judge and withdraw the Court of Appeals of Santiago from its competence to adjudicate present or future claims.
| Título traducido de la contribución | The Right of Option established in Article 36 bis of the Public Works Concessions Law. Commentary on the ruling of the Supreme Court, dated November 30, 2017, Docket N° 35,751-2017 |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 130-138 |
| Número de páginas | 9 |
| Publicación | Revista Juridica Digital Uandes |
| Volumen | 7 |
| N.º | 1 |
| DOI |
|
| Estado | Publicada - 14 jun. 2023 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2023, University of the Andes. All rights reserved.
Palabras clave
- Arbitral Commission
- concessionaire company
- Public Works Concessions
- right of choice
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'El derecho de opción establecido en el artículo 36 bis de la Ley de Concesiones de Obra Pública. Comentario a la sentencia de la Corte Suprema, de 30 de noviembre de 2017, rol N° 35.751-2017'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver