TY - JOUR
T1 - Do subjects with forced lip closure have different perioral and jaw muscles activity?
AU - Gamboa, Natalia Andrea
AU - Fuentes, Aler Daniel
AU - Matus, Carolina Paz
AU - Marín, Karla Francesca
AU - Gutiérrez, Mario Felipe
AU - Miralles, Rodolfo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2019/10/30
Y1 - 2019/10/30
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the activity of mentalis (MN), buccinator (BC), and suprahyoid (SH) muscles among participants with different lip competence. Methods: Sixty-three participants were classified clinically and assigned to the following groups of 21 each: 1) competent lips (competent), 2) incompetent lips (incompetent), or 3) forced lip closure (forced). Activity was recorded at rest, swallowing, speaking, reciprocal compression of the lips, and chewing. Results: MN activity in incompetent was significantly higher than competent at rest, and it was significantly higher in incompetent and forced when compared with competent during swallowing (p<.05). No differences among incompetent and forced were observed (p>.05). During speaking, reciprocal compression of the lips, and chewing, MN activity did not show significant differences among groups. BC and SH activity did not show significant differences (p>.05). Conclusion: MN activity during swallowing can be considered a relevant biomarker to differentiate between forced and competent participants.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the activity of mentalis (MN), buccinator (BC), and suprahyoid (SH) muscles among participants with different lip competence. Methods: Sixty-three participants were classified clinically and assigned to the following groups of 21 each: 1) competent lips (competent), 2) incompetent lips (incompetent), or 3) forced lip closure (forced). Activity was recorded at rest, swallowing, speaking, reciprocal compression of the lips, and chewing. Results: MN activity in incompetent was significantly higher than competent at rest, and it was significantly higher in incompetent and forced when compared with competent during swallowing (p<.05). No differences among incompetent and forced were observed (p>.05). During speaking, reciprocal compression of the lips, and chewing, MN activity did not show significant differences among groups. BC and SH activity did not show significant differences (p>.05). Conclusion: MN activity during swallowing can be considered a relevant biomarker to differentiate between forced and competent participants.
KW - EMG activity
KW - Forced lip closure
KW - competent lips
KW - incompetent lips
KW - perioral muscle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074802589&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/08869634.2019.1686247
DO - 10.1080/08869634.2019.1686247
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85074802589
SN - 0886-9634
VL - 40
SP - 48
EP - 54
JO - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice
JF - Cranio - Journal of Craniomandibular Practice
IS - 1
ER -