Resumen
In this essay, based on an interpretation of the Cratylus, I defend that Plato conceives the mediation of ordinary language as necessary for the dialectical investigation of reality. In the discussion about the rightness of names, Socrates maintains a compatibilist position between Conventionalism and Naturalism that allows him to judge the imperfection in the establishment of names. Such reconstruction allows us to conceive both the criticism of etymology as a research method, and the dialectics as an overcoming method. The dialectician, to be successful, must consider the necessary imperfection of our names.
| Título traducido de la contribución | DIALOGUE WITH WHAT? THE SOCRATIC WAY ON NAMES IN THE CRATYLUS AND THE POSSIBILITY OF DIALECTICS AS A RESEARCH METHOD |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 1-26 |
| Número de páginas | 26 |
| Publicación | Hypnos |
| N.º | 52 |
| Estado | Publicada - 2024 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2024 Paulus Editora. All rights reserved.
Palabras clave
- Cratylus
- dialectics
- epistemology
- language
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de '¿DIALOGAR CON QUÉ? LA VÍA SOCRÁTICA SOBRE LOS NOMBRES EN EL CRÁTILO Y LA POSIBILIDAD DE LA DIALÉCTICA COMO MÉTODO DE INVESTIGACIÓN'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver