Resumen
The grounds for granting a specific pardon have been neglected by Chilean criminal doctrine. This has undermined the need to explain, in political and criminal terms, its origin, interpretation, and granting in accordance with the principles of security, legality, and human dignity in Chile. An examination of the grounds for the decrees leads to the conclusion that the right to petition can be a valid tool for reviewing their reasonableness before the Constitutional Court, a right that is enshrined in the Chilean Constitution and whose use is explored for these purposes initially in Chilean literature. In this context, the distinction between reasonableness and discretion allows for a constitutional response to unfounded pardons, avoiding the extinction of criminal responsibility because of a government act. Within this framework, the article questions the old doctrine that considers that government acts cannot be challenged when it comes to private pardons.
| Título traducido de la contribución | Constitutional control of the particular pardon: The right to a reasonableness petition before the authority |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 321-344 |
| Publicación | Revista de Derecho Politico |
| N.º | 126 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - 24 jul 2026 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2026, Departamento de Derecho Constitucional, Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia. All rights reserved.
ODS de las Naciones Unidas
Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
-
ODS 16: Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Constitutional control of the particular pardon: The right to a reasonableness petition before the authority'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver