Resumen
Recent randomized controlled trials confirmed the beneficial outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) compared with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with severe three-vessel coronary artery and left main disease. An increased long-term survival after CABG is associated with a reduction in spontaneous myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates. While PCI treats only flow-limiting lesions, CABG treats the whole coronary artery, preventing events in the future. Due to different clinical and anatomic factors affecting the outcomes, the heart team should formulate treatment assignment recommendations.
| Título traducido de la contribución | Coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with severe three vessel disease |
|---|---|
| Idioma original | Español |
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 1182-1188 |
| Número de páginas | 7 |
| Publicación | Revista Medica de Chile |
| Volumen | 149 |
| N.º | 8 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Publicada - ago. 2021 |
Nota bibliográfica
Publisher Copyright:© 2021 Sociedad Medica de Santiago. All rights reserved.
Palabras clave
- Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Cirugía de revascularización miocárdica versus angioplastía en el tratamiento de la enfermedad coronaria de tres vasos y tronco de la coronaria izquierda'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver