TY - JOUR
T1 - Bayesian updating and identifiability assessment of nonlinear finite element models
AU - Ramancha, Mukesh K.
AU - Astroza, Rodrigo
AU - Madarshahian, Ramin
AU - Conte, Joel P.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding for this work by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers through the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Research Cooperative Agreement W912HZ-17-2-0024 is gratefully acknowledged.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2022/3/15
Y1 - 2022/3/15
N2 - A promising and attractive way of performing structural health monitoring (SHM) and damage prognosis (DP) of engineering systems is through utilizing a nonlinear finite element (FE) model. Often, FE models contain parameters that are unknown or known with significant level of uncertainty. Such parameters need to be estimated/updated/calibrated using data measured from the physical system. The Bayesian paradigm to model updating/calibration is attractive as it accounts, using a rigorous probabilistic framework, for numerous sources of uncertainties existing in the real-world. However, applying Bayesian methods to nonlinear FE models of large-scale civil structural systems is computationally very prohibitive. Additionally, non-identifiability of FE model parameters poses challenges in the model updating process. This paper presents Bayesian model updating and identifiability analysis of nonlinear FE models with a specific testbed civil structure, Pine Flat concrete gravity dam, as illustration example. Model updating is performed in the recursive mode using the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and in the batch mode using the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo (TMCMC) method. Limitations in terms of applicability and computational challenges of each method for model updating of large-scale nonlinear FE models are addressed and discussed. Identifiability and sensitivity analyses of the model are then performed using local and global methods. Local practical identifiability analysis using local sensitivity in conjunction with the Fisher information matrix is used to assess the parameter identifiability in a certain local region in the parameter space. Due to the nonexistence of a method to assess global practical identifiability, variance-based global sensitivity analysis (Sobol's method) is used herein. Identifiability and sensitivity analysis results are used to choose the parameters to be included in the model updating phase.
AB - A promising and attractive way of performing structural health monitoring (SHM) and damage prognosis (DP) of engineering systems is through utilizing a nonlinear finite element (FE) model. Often, FE models contain parameters that are unknown or known with significant level of uncertainty. Such parameters need to be estimated/updated/calibrated using data measured from the physical system. The Bayesian paradigm to model updating/calibration is attractive as it accounts, using a rigorous probabilistic framework, for numerous sources of uncertainties existing in the real-world. However, applying Bayesian methods to nonlinear FE models of large-scale civil structural systems is computationally very prohibitive. Additionally, non-identifiability of FE model parameters poses challenges in the model updating process. This paper presents Bayesian model updating and identifiability analysis of nonlinear FE models with a specific testbed civil structure, Pine Flat concrete gravity dam, as illustration example. Model updating is performed in the recursive mode using the unscented Kalman filter (UKF) and in the batch mode using the transitional Markov chain Monte Carlo (TMCMC) method. Limitations in terms of applicability and computational challenges of each method for model updating of large-scale nonlinear FE models are addressed and discussed. Identifiability and sensitivity analyses of the model are then performed using local and global methods. Local practical identifiability analysis using local sensitivity in conjunction with the Fisher information matrix is used to assess the parameter identifiability in a certain local region in the parameter space. Due to the nonexistence of a method to assess global practical identifiability, variance-based global sensitivity analysis (Sobol's method) is used herein. Identifiability and sensitivity analysis results are used to choose the parameters to be included in the model updating phase.
KW - Bayesian parameter estimation
KW - Finite element model
KW - Identifiability analysis
KW - Model calibration
KW - Model updating
KW - Nonlinear system identification
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Sobol’ indices
KW - Structural health monitoring
KW - Structural health monitoring
KW - Model updating
KW - Model calibration
KW - Finite element model
KW - Nonlinear system identification
KW - Bayesian parameter estimation
KW - Identifiability análisis
KW - Sensitivity análisis
KW - Sobol’ indices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118845613&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/94bb354f-bbfd-3740-a8ab-ff4115745916/
U2 - 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108517
DO - 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108517
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85118845613
SN - 0888-3270
VL - 167
JO - Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
JF - Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing
M1 - 108517
ER -