TY - JOUR
T1 - Association between psychosocial factors and satisfaction with communication in family members of intensive care unit patients during COVID-19 pandemic
T2 - An exploratory cross-sectional study
AU - Fortunatti, Cristobal Padilla
AU - Silva, Noelia Rojas
AU - Silva, Yasna Palmeiro
AU - Canales, Damary Meneses
AU - Veloso, Gladys Gajardo
AU - Acuña, Jessica Espinoza
AU - Castellon, Angelina Dois
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Objective: To investigate the relationship between satisfaction with communication and perceived stress, depressive symptoms and perceived social support among family members of critically ill. Research Methodology/Design: Exploratory, cross-sectional study was conducted. Setting: Private teaching hospital in Santiago, Chile. Main Outcomes Measures: Family members of critically ill patients with 3–7 days of stay and respiratory support were approached. Questionnaires were used to assess satisfaction with communication (Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit-24), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and perceived social support (Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey). The relationship between satisfaction with communication and relevant variables was investigated using bivariate analyses and a beta regression. Results: The study included 42 family members, with 71.4% being female and 52.4% having prior critical care experience. There was a positive correlation between perceived stress and depressive symptoms (r = 0.32, p = 0.039). According to the beta regression, perceived social support (B; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 [1.05–2.29]) and the number of calls with unit staff (0.17 [1.06–1.32]) were positively associated with satisfaction with communication but negatively with college education (−1.86 [0.04–0.64]) and perceived stress (−0.07 [0.87–0.99]). Conclusion: Psychosocial factors, such as higher educational level, perceived stress and perceived social support, can influence family members’ evaluation of communication with staff. Current communication practices in acute care settings should be adapted to family members’ psychosocial context to improve their satisfaction with the communication process. Implications for clinical practice: Critical care professionals must be aware of the influence of family member-related factors on the quality and effectiveness of the communication process. Psychosocial features of the family members are likely to impact their satisfaction with communication and should be assessed on admission and during their stay to assist clinicians to adjust and improve their communication practices.
AB - Objective: To investigate the relationship between satisfaction with communication and perceived stress, depressive symptoms and perceived social support among family members of critically ill. Research Methodology/Design: Exploratory, cross-sectional study was conducted. Setting: Private teaching hospital in Santiago, Chile. Main Outcomes Measures: Family members of critically ill patients with 3–7 days of stay and respiratory support were approached. Questionnaires were used to assess satisfaction with communication (Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit-24), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale-10), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and perceived social support (Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey). The relationship between satisfaction with communication and relevant variables was investigated using bivariate analyses and a beta regression. Results: The study included 42 family members, with 71.4% being female and 52.4% having prior critical care experience. There was a positive correlation between perceived stress and depressive symptoms (r = 0.32, p = 0.039). According to the beta regression, perceived social support (B; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 [1.05–2.29]) and the number of calls with unit staff (0.17 [1.06–1.32]) were positively associated with satisfaction with communication but negatively with college education (−1.86 [0.04–0.64]) and perceived stress (−0.07 [0.87–0.99]). Conclusion: Psychosocial factors, such as higher educational level, perceived stress and perceived social support, can influence family members’ evaluation of communication with staff. Current communication practices in acute care settings should be adapted to family members’ psychosocial context to improve their satisfaction with the communication process. Implications for clinical practice: Critical care professionals must be aware of the influence of family member-related factors on the quality and effectiveness of the communication process. Psychosocial features of the family members are likely to impact their satisfaction with communication and should be assessed on admission and during their stay to assist clinicians to adjust and improve their communication practices.
KW - Communication
KW - Family
KW - Intensive care units
KW - Nursing
KW - Social support
KW - Stress
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147368926
U2 - 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103386
DO - 10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103386
M3 - Article
C2 - 36706497
AN - SCOPUS:85147368926
SN - 0964-3397
VL - 76
JO - Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
JF - Intensive and Critical Care Nursing
M1 - 103386
ER -