TY - CHAP
T1 - Action intent
T2 - getting closer to leadership behavior in 22 countries
AU - Zander, Lena
AU - Mockaitis, Audra I.
AU - Harzing, Anne Wil
AU - Barner-Rasmussen, Wilhelm
AU - Barzantny, Cordula
AU - Choudhury, Srabani Roy
AU - Davila, Anabella
AU - De Leon, Joyce
AU - Espejo, Alvaro
AU - Ferreira, Rita
AU - Giroud, Axèle
AU - Köster, Kathrin
AU - Liang, Yung Kuei
AU - Morley, Michael J.
AU - Myloni, Barbara
AU - Odusanya, Joseph O.T.
AU - O’Sullivan, Sharon L.
AU - Palaniappan, Ananda Kumar
AU - Prochno, Paulo
AU - Saka-Helmhout, Ayse
AU - Siengthai, Sununta
AU - Soydaş, Ayda Uzunçarşılı
AU - Viswat, Linda
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Lena Zander 2020. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - The field of cross-cultural leadership has seen a boom in empirical research over the last few decades, yet there are still few large-scale studies that seek explanations for leadership behavior. Earlier research has provided knowledge and awareness about differences and similarities in leadership attitudes, ideals, perceptions and preferences across countries and cultures, but to predict leadership behavior remains difficult. In this chapter, leader’s ‘action intent’ is proposed as a ‘close-to-action’ concept in contrast to the more ‘far-from-action’ concepts used in earlier leadership research. Importantly, for ‘close-to-action’ concepts to be able to provide better predictions these need to provide contextual and situational cues. In our study, carried out in 22 countries, respondents have ranked their preferred action alternative for six specific leadership scenarios. We find inter-country and intra-country variation in action intent for each scenario and meaningful correlations with culturally endorsed leadership ideals. Drawing on our empirical illustration we provide implications from our findings for global leadership. And although there are no simple answers as to how to predict leadership behavior, we posit that using ‘action intent’ as a leadership measure will generate a better understanding and provide stronger predictions of leader behavior globally.
AB - The field of cross-cultural leadership has seen a boom in empirical research over the last few decades, yet there are still few large-scale studies that seek explanations for leadership behavior. Earlier research has provided knowledge and awareness about differences and similarities in leadership attitudes, ideals, perceptions and preferences across countries and cultures, but to predict leadership behavior remains difficult. In this chapter, leader’s ‘action intent’ is proposed as a ‘close-to-action’ concept in contrast to the more ‘far-from-action’ concepts used in earlier leadership research. Importantly, for ‘close-to-action’ concepts to be able to provide better predictions these need to provide contextual and situational cues. In our study, carried out in 22 countries, respondents have ranked their preferred action alternative for six specific leadership scenarios. We find inter-country and intra-country variation in action intent for each scenario and meaningful correlations with culturally endorsed leadership ideals. Drawing on our empirical illustration we provide implications from our findings for global leadership. And although there are no simple answers as to how to predict leadership behavior, we posit that using ‘action intent’ as a leadership measure will generate a better understanding and provide stronger predictions of leader behavior globally.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103823612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4337/9781782545354.00012
DO - 10.4337/9781782545354.00012
M3 - Chapter
AN - SCOPUS:85103823612
SN - 9781782545347
SP - 54
EP - 75
BT - Research Handbook of Global Leadership
PB - Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
ER -