TY - JOUR
T1 - A Transparency Maturity Model for Government Software Tenders
AU - Hochstetter, Jorge
AU - Vairetti, Carla
AU - Cares, Carlos
AU - Ojeda, Mauricio Garcia
AU - Maldonado, Sebastian
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by the Project Transparency in Public Electronic Procedures, from the Universidad de La Frontera in conjunction with the Universidad de Los Andes, under Grant Idea2019001. The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from CONICYT PIA-BASAL AFB180003 and FONDECYT-Chile, grants 1200221 (Sebasti n Maldonado) and 11200007 (Carla Vairetti).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 IEEE.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Over the last two decades, governments have increased their investment in information technology to improve the use of public resources, using public electronic procurement systems to obtain better prices, better solutions and to show transparency in the procurement process. Public procurement of software development projects is specific acquisitions having specific technical, methodological, and management constraints that make transparency an elusive target. This article proposes a maturity model as a tool to measure tendering transparency when government agencies procure software development. We have used a procedural model to support the design of maturity models along four dimensions: Institutionalization, Software procurement process, Communication, and Accountability. We have defined a five-step model, and we have tested it with real government buyers. The model is supported by an appraisal tool that helps to guide the next steps in the transparency of software acquisitions.
AB - Over the last two decades, governments have increased their investment in information technology to improve the use of public resources, using public electronic procurement systems to obtain better prices, better solutions and to show transparency in the procurement process. Public procurement of software development projects is specific acquisitions having specific technical, methodological, and management constraints that make transparency an elusive target. This article proposes a maturity model as a tool to measure tendering transparency when government agencies procure software development. We have used a procedural model to support the design of maturity models along four dimensions: Institutionalization, Software procurement process, Communication, and Accountability. We have defined a five-step model, and we have tested it with real government buyers. The model is supported by an appraisal tool that helps to guide the next steps in the transparency of software acquisitions.
KW - accountability
KW - Maturity models
KW - public tenders
KW - software requirements
KW - transparency
KW - accountability
KW - Maturity models
KW - public tenders
KW - software requirements
KW - transparency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103759810&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/345c93ba-1ed2-3ca4-8acd-a37819479093/
U2 - 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3067217
DO - 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3067217
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85103759810
SN - 2169-3536
VL - 9
SP - 45668
EP - 45682
JO - IEEE Access
JF - IEEE Access
M1 - 9381194
ER -