TY - JOUR
T1 - Variables Related to Plate Removal Needs Following Mandibular Sagittal Split Osteotomy
AU - Vargas, Erick
AU - Ravelo, Víctor
AU - Unibazo, Alejandro
AU - Chavez, Paulina
AU - Huentequeo, Claudio
AU - Olate, Sergio
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025
PY - 2025/11/19
Y1 - 2025/11/19
N2 - Aim: – This study analyzed the factors associated with osteosynthesis removal in patients who underwent a mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy. A retrospective analysis of 116 patients undergoing SSRO between 2022 and 2024 was conducted. Methods: – Variables such as age, sex, skeletal class, type of movement, and time to removal of the osteosynthesis plates were evaluated. Spearman and Mann-Whitney tests were performed, considering a value P<0.05 as a significant difference to determine associations between these variables and the need for osteosynthesis removal. Two hundred thirty-two SSRO were analyzed, and 292 osteosynthesis plates were installed. Results: – Twenty-five patients (21.55%) required plate removal, with a higher prevalence in women (P<0.02). The main cause of removal was plate exposure with or without wound infection (80.39%). Subjects with skeletal class II had a higher incidence of complications (P<0.03), especially those with larger mandibular movements. Plate removal occurred at an average of 7.5±6.1 months postoperatively. Conclusions: – Osteosynthesis removal after SSRO should be performed selectively and is primarily related to subjects with a class II facial deformity.
AB - Aim: – This study analyzed the factors associated with osteosynthesis removal in patients who underwent a mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy. A retrospective analysis of 116 patients undergoing SSRO between 2022 and 2024 was conducted. Methods: – Variables such as age, sex, skeletal class, type of movement, and time to removal of the osteosynthesis plates were evaluated. Spearman and Mann-Whitney tests were performed, considering a value P<0.05 as a significant difference to determine associations between these variables and the need for osteosynthesis removal. Two hundred thirty-two SSRO were analyzed, and 292 osteosynthesis plates were installed. Results: – Twenty-five patients (21.55%) required plate removal, with a higher prevalence in women (P<0.02). The main cause of removal was plate exposure with or without wound infection (80.39%). Subjects with skeletal class II had a higher incidence of complications (P<0.03), especially those with larger mandibular movements. Plate removal occurred at an average of 7.5±6.1 months postoperatively. Conclusions: – Osteosynthesis removal after SSRO should be performed selectively and is primarily related to subjects with a class II facial deformity.
KW - Mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy
KW - orthognathic surgery
KW - osteosynthesis removal
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105005303999
U2 - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011477
DO - 10.1097/SCS.0000000000011477
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105005303999
SN - 1049-2275
VL - 36
SP - e914-e917
JO - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
IS - 7
ER -