Thinking styles and engineering: Proposals for strengthening the professional training of engineers through physics courses

C. Gaete-Peralta, J. Huincahue

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

One way to contribute to the strengthening of professional training processes in Engineering is through teaching and evaluation methods physics courses that promote those thinking styles that should be preferred by an engineer to solve tasks of their profession. Based on the above, the objective of this research was to identify those thinking styles that ideally a graduate of industrial civil engineering from a certain Chilean university should prefer to perform their profession tasks. Responding to this objective, it will be possible to generate educational proposals in physics courses for that career. For this, a qualitative methodology called thematic analysis was used. The data sources were semi-structured interviews with academics with enough experience in the career, besides the analysis of the institutional graduation profile. From a deductive perspective, according to the thinking styles, the ideal preferences for the egislative, judicial, global, hierarchical, liberal and external styles emerged as a result. Finally, a discussion was held on some teaching and evaluation methods that can be carried out in the physics courses of this career in order to promote these thinking styles.

Original languageEnglish
Article number012020
JournalJournal of Physics: Conference Series
Volume1702
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2020
Externally publishedYes
Event7th International Conference Days of Applied Mathematics, ICDAM 2020 - San Jose de Cucuta, Colombia
Duration: 4 Nov 20206 Nov 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Thinking styles and engineering: Proposals for strengthening the professional training of engineers through physics courses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this