TY - JOUR
T1 - The why, how, and what of indicator-based monitoring of nature-based solutions
T2 - Perspectives from EU and LAC city practitioners
AU - van Lierop, Martina
AU - Dobbs, Cynnamon
AU - van der Jagt, Alexander
AU - Skiba, Andrea
AU - Flores, Camila
AU - Maselli Locosselli, Giuliano
AU - Duarte, Denise
AU - Zingraff-Hamed, Aude
AU - Pauleit, Stephan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Indicator-based monitoring (IM) is crucial to support the uptake of Nature-based Solutions (NbS), to improve the knowledge of NbS benefits, and to promote evidence-based decision-making. Despite the growth of indicator frameworks to support practitioners in setting up IM processes for NbS, practitioners’ perspectives and experiences of IM application, especially in relation to NbS, have been underexplored. We address this knowledge gap through an exploratory study on practitioners’ decisions behind NbS-related IM through ten semi-structured interviews with experts from seven cities in the European (EU) and Latin American (LAC) region. LAC and EU practitioners use IM foremost to advocate the relevance and urgent need for improving urban sustainability. Novel compilations of eight applications of NbS-related IM in practice and three approaches to developing internally applied indicator frameworks were identified. More consideration of social indicators, technical feasibility, legitimacy, and temporal scales is needed for better and more inclusive NbS-related IM in practice.
AB - Indicator-based monitoring (IM) is crucial to support the uptake of Nature-based Solutions (NbS), to improve the knowledge of NbS benefits, and to promote evidence-based decision-making. Despite the growth of indicator frameworks to support practitioners in setting up IM processes for NbS, practitioners’ perspectives and experiences of IM application, especially in relation to NbS, have been underexplored. We address this knowledge gap through an exploratory study on practitioners’ decisions behind NbS-related IM through ten semi-structured interviews with experts from seven cities in the European (EU) and Latin American (LAC) region. LAC and EU practitioners use IM foremost to advocate the relevance and urgent need for improving urban sustainability. Novel compilations of eight applications of NbS-related IM in practice and three approaches to developing internally applied indicator frameworks were identified. More consideration of social indicators, technical feasibility, legitimacy, and temporal scales is needed for better and more inclusive NbS-related IM in practice.
KW - Assessment
KW - Evaluation
KW - Global North–Global South
KW - Indicator framework
KW - Practice
KW - Urban green infrastructure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105003266970&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13280-025-02174-0
DO - 10.1007/s13280-025-02174-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105003266970
SN - 0044-7447
JO - Ambio
JF - Ambio
M1 - 106661
ER -