The why, how, and what of indicator-based monitoring of nature-based solutions: Perspectives from EU and LAC city practitioners

Martina van Lierop*, Cynnamon Dobbs, Alexander van der Jagt, Andrea Skiba, Camila Flores, Giuliano Maselli Locosselli, Denise Duarte, Aude Zingraff-Hamed, Stephan Pauleit

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Indicator-based monitoring (IM) is crucial to support the uptake of Nature-based Solutions (NbS), to improve the knowledge of NbS benefits, and to promote evidence-based decision-making. Despite the growth of indicator frameworks to support practitioners in setting up IM processes for NbS, practitioners’ perspectives and experiences of IM application, especially in relation to NbS, have been underexplored. We address this knowledge gap through an exploratory study on practitioners’ decisions behind NbS-related IM through ten semi-structured interviews with experts from seven cities in the European (EU) and Latin American (LAC) region. LAC and EU practitioners use IM foremost to advocate the relevance and urgent need for improving urban sustainability. Novel compilations of eight applications of NbS-related IM in practice and three approaches to developing internally applied indicator frameworks were identified. More consideration of social indicators, technical feasibility, legitimacy, and temporal scales is needed for better and more inclusive NbS-related IM in practice.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106661
JournalAmbio
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Evaluation
  • Global North–Global South
  • Indicator framework
  • Practice
  • Urban green infrastructure

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The why, how, and what of indicator-based monitoring of nature-based solutions: Perspectives from EU and LAC city practitioners'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this