TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of image display systems on observers’ preference for visualizing subtle dental radiographic abnormalities
AU - Shujaat, Sohaib
AU - Letelier, Carolina
AU - De Grauwe, Annelore
AU - Desard, Hadewych
AU - Orhan, Kaan
AU - Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria
AU - Mangione, Francesca
AU - Coucke, Wim
AU - Jacobs, Reinhilde
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Objective: The objectives of this study were to assess observers’ preference for standard screens (SSs) or medical displays (MDs) in visualizing difficult-to-diagnose radiographic dental abnormalities and their preference for dental filter tools when utilized with MD systems. Study Design: A retrospective data set of 60 in vivo radiographs consisting of intraoral (n = 20), panoramic (n = 20), and cone beam computed tomography (n = 20) images was created. Three image display monitors, including an SS, an MD, and an MD with 3 dental filter configurations (bone–low density enhancement filter, tooth–high density enhancement filter, and a combined filter representing regular MD), were utilized to assess 4 observers’ monitor preferences in detecting radiographically subtle dental abnormalities. The data were analyzed by using binomial distribution. A P value ≤.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Although observers expressed preference for MD for visualizing some abnormalities when examining intraoral and panoramic radiographs, MD was not preferred for detection of any abnormalities with cone beam computed tomography. There were no significant differences in preference for SS or MD overall (P ≥ .2024). Observers expressed significant preference for the filters in visualizing all but 2 abnormalities (P ≤ .0252). Conclusions: The use of MD monitors enabled with dental filter tools may be preferred for visualizing certain subtle abnormalities.
AB - Objective: The objectives of this study were to assess observers’ preference for standard screens (SSs) or medical displays (MDs) in visualizing difficult-to-diagnose radiographic dental abnormalities and their preference for dental filter tools when utilized with MD systems. Study Design: A retrospective data set of 60 in vivo radiographs consisting of intraoral (n = 20), panoramic (n = 20), and cone beam computed tomography (n = 20) images was created. Three image display monitors, including an SS, an MD, and an MD with 3 dental filter configurations (bone–low density enhancement filter, tooth–high density enhancement filter, and a combined filter representing regular MD), were utilized to assess 4 observers’ monitor preferences in detecting radiographically subtle dental abnormalities. The data were analyzed by using binomial distribution. A P value ≤.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Although observers expressed preference for MD for visualizing some abnormalities when examining intraoral and panoramic radiographs, MD was not preferred for detection of any abnormalities with cone beam computed tomography. There were no significant differences in preference for SS or MD overall (P ≥ .2024). Observers expressed significant preference for the filters in visualizing all but 2 abnormalities (P ≤ .0252). Conclusions: The use of MD monitors enabled with dental filter tools may be preferred for visualizing certain subtle abnormalities.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099652877&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.12.021
DO - 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.12.021
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85099652877
SN - 2212-4403
VL - 132
SP - 475
EP - 482
JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
IS - 4
ER -