TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy using cone beam CT and multislice CT
AU - Vandenberghe, Bart
AU - Luchsinger, S.
AU - Hostens, J.
AU - Dhoore, E.
AU - Jacobs, R.
PY - 2012/9/1
Y1 - 2012/9/1
N2 - Objective: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy when using cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT (MSCT). Methods: A lower and an upper edentulous human cadaver jaw were scanned using micro-CT (Skyscan 1173 high energy spiral scan micro-CT; Skyscan NV, Kontich, Belgium) at 35 mm to serve as true reference. The in vitro samples were exposed using six CBCT units and one MSCT system. CBCT exposure protocols were chosen according to clinically available settings. The variables were kilovoltage, milliamperage, voxel size and/or scan time. Image segmentation was based on local thresholds using profile lines. The resulting jawbone segmentations were registered with the reference and image processing was done to internally fill the segmentations. A point-based distance calculation was performed between the three-dimensional objects and reference scans and deviation percentages were calculated for 2 mm, 1mm and 0.5mm intervals. Results: All points of the MSCT surface models lay within a 1mm deviation range and 98.5% within 0.5 mmcompared with micro-CT. For the different CBCT systems, accuracy came close to MSCT with mean percentages of 98.9% within 1mm deviation and 92.8% within 0.5mm. A difference of approximately 1% between lower and upper jaws could be perceived. For the specific CBCT exposure protocols, only scan time and voxel size revealed certain significant differences. Conclusion: Jawbone model accuracy using CBCT was comparable with MSCT. The surface models of the upper jaws deviated slightly more than those for lower jaws. CBCT exposure settings had a limited influence on accuracy with scan time and voxel size as the main factors.
AB - Objective: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of exposure parameters on jawbone model accuracy when using cone beam CT (CBCT) and multislice CT (MSCT). Methods: A lower and an upper edentulous human cadaver jaw were scanned using micro-CT (Skyscan 1173 high energy spiral scan micro-CT; Skyscan NV, Kontich, Belgium) at 35 mm to serve as true reference. The in vitro samples were exposed using six CBCT units and one MSCT system. CBCT exposure protocols were chosen according to clinically available settings. The variables were kilovoltage, milliamperage, voxel size and/or scan time. Image segmentation was based on local thresholds using profile lines. The resulting jawbone segmentations were registered with the reference and image processing was done to internally fill the segmentations. A point-based distance calculation was performed between the three-dimensional objects and reference scans and deviation percentages were calculated for 2 mm, 1mm and 0.5mm intervals. Results: All points of the MSCT surface models lay within a 1mm deviation range and 98.5% within 0.5 mmcompared with micro-CT. For the different CBCT systems, accuracy came close to MSCT with mean percentages of 98.9% within 1mm deviation and 92.8% within 0.5mm. A difference of approximately 1% between lower and upper jaws could be perceived. For the specific CBCT exposure protocols, only scan time and voxel size revealed certain significant differences. Conclusion: Jawbone model accuracy using CBCT was comparable with MSCT. The surface models of the upper jaws deviated slightly more than those for lower jaws. CBCT exposure settings had a limited influence on accuracy with scan time and voxel size as the main factors.
KW - Cone beam computed tomography
KW - Exposure protocol
KW - Segmentation
KW - Surface model accuracy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865213254&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/dmfr/81272805
DO - 10.1259/dmfr/81272805
M3 - Article
C2 - 22282512
AN - SCOPUS:84865213254
SN - 0250-832X
VL - 41
SP - 466
EP - 474
JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
IS - 6
ER -