In this paper, the author attempts to show the significance of the principle of double effect in general practical reasoning and, especially, in legal reasoning. To this aim, he proceeds in the following way. Firstly, he studies the nature of the principle as a rule to moral deliberation. Secondly, with the purpose of illustrating the main situations in which the principle has been applied, he offers an exposition regarding its historical development. Thirdly, he argues for the necessity of accepting the principle of double effect, proving that it is the only non-consequentialist way to attribute responsibility for the effects of human acts. Fourthly, he examines the principle's requirements and establishes the way in which they have to be understood. Finally, he gives some examples in various legal fields where the principle can be a useful device for judicial and legislative reasoning.
|Translated title of the contribution||The double effect principle and its relevance to juridical interpretation|
|Number of pages||35|
|Journal||Revista Chilena de Derecho|
|State||Published - Dec 2008|