Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Distinct Role of Family History and Polygenic Risk Scores of Psychiatric Disorders on Lithium Response in Bipolar Disorder

  • Mete Ercis
  • , Brandon J. Coombes
  • , Lindsay M. Melhuish Beaupre
  • , Melissa Solares-Bravo
  • , Marin Veldic
  • , Katherine M. Moore
  • , Hannah K. Betcher
  • , Francisco Romo-Nava
  • , Aysegul Ozerdem
  • , David J. Bond
  • , Alfredo B. Cuellar-Barboza
  • , Miguel L. Prieto
  • , Susan L. McElroy
  • , Mark A. Frye
  • , Joanna M. Biernacka
  • , Balwinder Singh*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to explore the effect of family history (FH) and polygenic risk scores (PRS) for multiple psychiatric disorders on lithium response in bipolar disorder (BD). Method: The sample included patients from the Mayo Clinic BD Biobank. FH in first-degree relatives was obtained via the patient questionnaire. Linear regression models tested the association of FH and PRS for BD, major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SCZ), alcohol use disorder (AUD), anxiety disorder (ANX), and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) with lithium response measured by the Alda A score adjusted for the Alda B sum score. Post hoc models additionally adjusted for clinical covariates (age at onset, rapid cycling, and BD subtype). Results: 716 patients had Alda scores for lithium response (61.9% females, mean age = 43.4 years). FH-BD (β = −0.57, p = 0.015), AUD (β = −0.44, p = 0.045), and ANX (β = −0.61, p = 0.050) were associated with worse lithium response. After adjusting for clinical covariates, associations for FH-BD and FH-ANX were no longer significant. PRS-BD was associated with better response (β = 0.22, p = 0.041), while PRS-MDD (β = −0.28, p = 0.01) and PRS-ADHD (β = −0.24, p = 0.028) were associated with worse response, with effects largely unchanged after adjusting for clinical covariates. In the combined model considering all FHs simultaneously, only FH-BD remained significantly associated with worse lithium response (β = −0.71, p = 0.039). In the combined model for PRS, only PRS-BD (β = 0.31, p = 0.008; better response) and PRS-MDD (β = −0.29, p = 0.020; worse response) showed significant associations. Conclusions: In this exploratory study, FH-BD, AUD, and ANX were associated with poor response, though only FH-AUD remained significant after adjusting for clinical factors. PRS-BD predicted better response, while PRS-MDD was associated with worse response. These findings suggest independent and potentially complementary roles of FH and PRS. Integrating both familial and genetic risk measures may improve personalized treatment strategies and outcomes for BD patients.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70126
JournalBipolar Disorders
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Alda scale
  • bipolar disorder
  • family history
  • genetic risk score
  • lithium
  • treatment response

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Distinct Role of Family History and Polygenic Risk Scores of Psychiatric Disorders on Lithium Response in Bipolar Disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this