Abstract
This paper proposes that Hannah Arendt’s book Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil furnishes both philosophical and empirical elements to understand not only the Nazi crimes but also cases of wrongdoing by and within current organizations. It is suggested that Arendt provides three relevant standpoints to how wrongdoing is banalized within organizations: a critique of bureaucratic administration, an account of the role of interactive socialization, and a reflection on the cognitive and meaning-attribution processes. Arendt originally connected these three dimensions to thoughtlessness, understood as a process of routinization in which organizations discourage critical thinking, personal responsibility, and reflection about the ultimate meaning and consequences of actions and decisions. As opposed to this, thoughtfulness is proposed as an approach based on meaningful pursuit within organizations to avoid some of the normative, cognitive, and routine elements that encourage, justify, and reproduce the banalization of misconduct.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 713-727 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Journal of Business Ethics |
| Volume | 195 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Banalization of misconduct
- Dispersed responsibility
- Hannah Arendt
- Organizational Wrongdoing
- Thoughtlessness
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Banality of Organizational Wrongdoing: A Reading on Arendt’s Thoughtlessness Thesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver