Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The Absence of Need in Husserl as an Explanatory Concept of the Phenomenon of Value: A Proposal from Carl Menger and Ludwig Feuerbach

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper explores some of the problems raised by the Husserlian explanatory model of affective acts in relation to the phenomenon of value. It is divided into two main parts. In the first, Husserl's theory of value is analyzed from the perspective of its foundational acts, paying special attention to the problem of the relation between objectifying and non-objectifying acts. This section concludes that the intentional schema with which Husserl analyzes affective acts presents problems that derive from his "visual" interpretation. In the second part, the converging ideas of Carl Menger and Ludwig Feuerbach on value theory and action are presented, based on which it is proposed that the missing element in the Husserlian schema is the concept of need. With this concept, an extended intentional scheme of affective acts is developed, featuring a double intentionality of consciousness directed to both the subject and the object.

Translated title of the contributionLa ausencia de la necesidad en Husserl como concepto explicativo del fenómeno del valor. Una propuesta desde Carl Menger y Ludwig Feuerbach
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)435-474
Number of pages40
JournalTopicos (Mexico)
Volume76
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Keywords

  • affective acts
  • Feuerbach
  • Husserl
  • intentionality
  • Menger
  • necessity
  • non-objectifying acts
  • phenomenology
  • value theory

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Absence of Need in Husserl as an Explanatory Concept of the Phenomenon of Value: A Proposal from Carl Menger and Ludwig Feuerbach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this