Supporting inefficient firms with capital subsidies: China and Germany in the 1990s

Sebastian Claro*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations


With different emphasis during the 1990s, both China and Germany introduced policies to lower the cost of capital for productivity-backward domestic firms. Capital subsidies compensated for the rental rate gap between state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and nonstate-owned enterprises in China and between eastern and western producers in Germany. In Germany, excessive wage pressures immediately following unification decreased the return to capital in the East to negative rates. However, productivity convergence and the decrease in wage pressures led to a rental rate gap of around 70% by the mid 1990s. Throughout the decade, the rental rate gap was higher in China than in Germany due to a large productivity gap and to high non-wage benefits provided by SOEs. Overall, the higher cost of the policy in China can be explained by the more generous coverage of capital subsidies. Journal of Comparative Economics 34 (2) (2006) 377-401.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-401
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Comparative Economics
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2006
Externally publishedYes


  • Capital subsidies
  • China
  • Germany
  • Integration
  • Productivity gap


Dive into the research topics of 'Supporting inefficient firms with capital subsidies: China and Germany in the 1990s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this