SMITHIAN MORAL JUDGEMENT: HUMEAN PASSIONS AND BEYOND

Maria A. Carrasco*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Smithian (supposedly) irregular feelings reveal the internal structure of moral judgements by showing that they consist of two distinct elements. These elements belong to different dynamisms of human nature, are triggered by different causes, and produce different reactions in the agent. In the case of resentment, I call them animal resentment and moral resentment, respectively. Animal resentment closely resembles Hume’s account of resentment and follows his theory of the passions. Moral resentment is different, for it is not caused directly by pain, but by the recognition of the evil intention of the aggressor. Finally, plain moral resentment – or resentment caused by an unjust action and approved of by the impartial spectator – blends these elements into a unity articulated by Hume’s theory of the passions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)275-292
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Scottish Philosophy
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Edinburgh University Press www.euppublishing.com/jsp.

Keywords

  • Hume
  • moral judgment
  • passions
  • Smith

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'SMITHIAN MORAL JUDGEMENT: HUMEAN PASSIONS AND BEYOND'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this