TY - JOUR
T1 - Simplified biplanar (0–90°) fluoroscopic puncture technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
T2 - the learning curve
AU - Manzo, B. O.
AU - Torres, J. E.
AU - Cabrera, J. D.
AU - Lozada, E.
AU - Emiliani, E.
AU - Sepulveda, F.
AU - Morales, C.
AU - Morales, I.
AU - Sanchez, H. M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the learning curve of the simplified fluoroscopic biplanar (0–90º) puncture technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods: We prospectively evaluated patients with renal stones treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy by a single institution’s fellows employing the simplified bi-planar (0–90º) fluoroscopic puncture technique for renal access. The learning curve was assessed with the fluoroscopic screening time and the percutaneous renal puncture time. Data obtained were compared to a subset of patients operated by a senior surgeon. Results: Eighty-nine patients were included in the study. Forty patients were operated by fellow-1, 39 by fellow-2, and 10 patients by the senior surgeon. Demographic data of all patients between groups were homogeneous, with no difference in gender (p = 0.432), age (p = 0.92), stone volume (p = 0.78), puncture laterality (p = 0.755), and body mass index (p = 0.365). The mean puncture time was 7.5, 4, and 3.1 min for fellow-1, fellow-2, and expert, respectively. The mean fluoroscopic screening time for the puncture was 10, 11, and 5.1 s for fellow-1, fellow-2, and the expert, respectively. Stone cases, both fellows needed to complete 10 procedures to match the senior surgeon in the mean puncture time (p = 0.046); meanwhile, the fluoroscopic screening time was equal even before to complete 10 procedures. Conclusion: This study suggests that with the simplified biplanar (0–90º) puncture technique, the fluoroscopic screening time used in the learning process is brief. A novice fellow could require to complete ten cases to flatten the learning curve treating complex stone cases, and a flat learning curve is seen since the beginning when treating simple renal stones.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the learning curve of the simplified fluoroscopic biplanar (0–90º) puncture technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Methods: We prospectively evaluated patients with renal stones treated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy by a single institution’s fellows employing the simplified bi-planar (0–90º) fluoroscopic puncture technique for renal access. The learning curve was assessed with the fluoroscopic screening time and the percutaneous renal puncture time. Data obtained were compared to a subset of patients operated by a senior surgeon. Results: Eighty-nine patients were included in the study. Forty patients were operated by fellow-1, 39 by fellow-2, and 10 patients by the senior surgeon. Demographic data of all patients between groups were homogeneous, with no difference in gender (p = 0.432), age (p = 0.92), stone volume (p = 0.78), puncture laterality (p = 0.755), and body mass index (p = 0.365). The mean puncture time was 7.5, 4, and 3.1 min for fellow-1, fellow-2, and expert, respectively. The mean fluoroscopic screening time for the puncture was 10, 11, and 5.1 s for fellow-1, fellow-2, and the expert, respectively. Stone cases, both fellows needed to complete 10 procedures to match the senior surgeon in the mean puncture time (p = 0.046); meanwhile, the fluoroscopic screening time was equal even before to complete 10 procedures. Conclusion: This study suggests that with the simplified biplanar (0–90º) puncture technique, the fluoroscopic screening time used in the learning process is brief. A novice fellow could require to complete ten cases to flatten the learning curve treating complex stone cases, and a flat learning curve is seen since the beginning when treating simple renal stones.
KW - Fluoroscopy
KW - Learning curve
KW - Percutaneous
KW - Puncture
KW - Radiation
KW - Renal stones
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85102867512
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-021-03669-7
DO - 10.1007/s00345-021-03669-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 33758960
AN - SCOPUS:85102867512
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 39
SP - 3657
EP - 3663
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 9
ER -