Pricing for a Common Good: beyond Ethical Minimalism in Commercial Practices

Javier Pinto-Garay, Ignacio Ferrero, Germán Scalzo*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Pricing policies and fair-trade practices are critical for sustaining commercial relationships between firms and customers. Nevertheless, in current business practices, fairness has been mistakenly reduced to a minimalistic ethic wherein justice only demands legal and explicit norms to which commercial parties voluntarily agree. Aimed at giving a different explanation of commercial agreements, this paper will introduce a Virtue Ethics (VE) explanation of the relationship between pricing and the common good by taking up classical concepts related to justice in commerce. In particular, we will explore three principles associated with the notion of fairness in commerce as defined in Neo-Aristotelian ethics towards a relationship between a common good and justice in pricing, i.e., proportionality, benevolence and well-being. To exemplify how these criteria of justice apply to decision-making in commercial practices, we will discuss several cases of fair and unfair commercial relationships.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)271-291
Number of pages21
JournalPhilosophy of Management
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG part of Springer Nature.

Keywords

  • Commercial justice
  • Common good
  • Pricing
  • Virtue ethics
  • Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pricing for a Common Good: beyond Ethical Minimalism in Commercial Practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this