Philoponus' Potentially Ensouled Bodies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In commenting on Aristotle’s ‘most common account’ (κοινότατος λόγος) of the soul – which portrays it as ‘the first actuality of a natural body having life in potentiality’– Philoponus suggests that seeds and embryos are not potentially alive bodies, despite ‘having become ready to receive life from the soul’ (209.17). To the extent that something’s suitability to be ensouled turns it eo ipso into a potentially alive thing, Philoponus’ remark may betray a contradiction, that can be handled by tinkering with the scope of a closely attached adverb. This paper argues that no such intervention is required, however, and that apparent inconsistencies vanish as soon as Neoplatonic embryology and Philoponus’ lexical background are given their due.
Original languageAmerican English
JournalAncient Philosophy
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Philoponus' Potentially Ensouled Bodies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this