Abstract
This essay interprets KrV A 592-602/B 620-630 not only as a refutation of the ontological argument, but as the place where Kant faces a more radical question: how is it possible for the human understanding - considered from the point of view of general logic - to predicate existence? The second part argues that Kant's discussion of the thesis "'exists' is not a real predicate" is a contribution to the solution of that question which is independent of the discussion of the ontological argument.
| Translated title of the contribution | Perspective, unity, and scope of Kant's criticisms to two interpretations of "exists": Kritik der reinen Vernunft A 592-602/8 620-630 (II) |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 583-600 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Anuario Filosofico |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| State | Published - 2011 |