On machiavelli's conception of the good prince

Rafael Simian*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Traditionally, Machiavelli's Prince has been read as defending a new ethico-political ideal, thus aiming to invalidate and replace those of Cicero and of Christianity. However, Cassirer, Viroli, and Berlin have argued, each in their own way, that this is not true. The essay presents these interpreters' readings and highlights their main points. Then it examines Machiavelli's texts to see whether those points are correct. The textual analysis leads to the conclusion that the traditional reading is plausible, whereas the other three are unconvincing. Stress is made on the fact that Machiavelli's ethico-political ideal in The Prince involves serious restrictions: First, it is not an ideal valid for everybody; and second, it is valid only under certain political circumstances which escape our control and make it necessary for the life and prosperity of the community.

Translated title of the contributionOn machiavelli's conception of the good prince
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)229-248
Number of pages20
JournalPensamiento
Volume77
Issue number294
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Universidad Pontificia Comillas de Madrid. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'On machiavelli's conception of the good prince'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this