TY - JOUR
T1 - Observer preference for a dedicated medical display vs a standard screen in the detection of dental radioanatomic features
AU - Shujaat, Sohaib
AU - Letelier, Carolina
AU - De Grauwe, Annelore
AU - de Faria Vasconcelos, Karla
AU - Celikten, Berkan
AU - Jacobs, Reinhilde
N1 - © 2020 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Objective: The aim of this study was to assess observers’ preference for a dentomaxillofacial dedicated medical display (MD) vs a general-purpose standard screen (SS) for in vitro and in vivo observation of normal radioanatomic features. Study Design: The in vitro sample consisted of 2-dimensional (2-D) intraoral (n = 15), panoramic (n = 2), cephalometric (n = 2), and 3-dimensional (3-D) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (n = 9) data sets, acquired by utilizing commercially available skull and head-and-neck phantoms. The in vivo sample consisted of 80 radiographs (intraoral = 20; panoramic = 20; cephalometric = 20; and CBCT = 20). In vitro and in vivo data sets were both acquired by using Minray, Promax2-D, and Vistapano Ceph for 2-D images and Accuitomo, NewTom VGi evo, and Promax3-D for CBCT images. Five observers entered screen preferences when evaluating the appearance of radioanatomic structures on MD and SS. Results: Both in vitro and in vivo assessments showed good interobserver and excellent intraobserver agreement. In vitro data suggested a significant preference for MD over SS for viewing radioanatomic features on panoramic and CBCT images, whereas MD was significantly preferred for in vivo images of all imaging modalities (P < .001). Conclusions: Overall, observers preferred MD over SS for both in vitro and in vivo observation of normal radioanatomic features irrespective of the imaging modality.
AB - Objective: The aim of this study was to assess observers’ preference for a dentomaxillofacial dedicated medical display (MD) vs a general-purpose standard screen (SS) for in vitro and in vivo observation of normal radioanatomic features. Study Design: The in vitro sample consisted of 2-dimensional (2-D) intraoral (n = 15), panoramic (n = 2), cephalometric (n = 2), and 3-dimensional (3-D) cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (n = 9) data sets, acquired by utilizing commercially available skull and head-and-neck phantoms. The in vivo sample consisted of 80 radiographs (intraoral = 20; panoramic = 20; cephalometric = 20; and CBCT = 20). In vitro and in vivo data sets were both acquired by using Minray, Promax2-D, and Vistapano Ceph for 2-D images and Accuitomo, NewTom VGi evo, and Promax3-D for CBCT images. Five observers entered screen preferences when evaluating the appearance of radioanatomic structures on MD and SS. Results: Both in vitro and in vivo assessments showed good interobserver and excellent intraobserver agreement. In vitro data suggested a significant preference for MD over SS for viewing radioanatomic features on panoramic and CBCT images, whereas MD was significantly preferred for in vivo images of all imaging modalities (P < .001). Conclusions: Overall, observers preferred MD over SS for both in vitro and in vivo observation of normal radioanatomic features irrespective of the imaging modality.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85082873661&origin=resultslist&sort=plf-f&src=s&sid=cc09775532ab01fc37bb56bc607668f6&sot=b&sdt=b&s=TITLE-ABS-KEY%28Observer+preference+for+a+dedicated+medical+display+vs+a+standard+screen+in+the+detection+of+dental+radioanatomic+features%29&sl=94&sessionSearchId=cc09775532ab01fc37bb56bc607668f6&relpos=0
U2 - 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.02.011
DO - 10.1016/j.oooo.2020.02.011
M3 - Article
SN - 2212-4403
VL - 130
SP - 217
EP - 224
JO - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
JF - Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology
IS - 2
ER -