Abstract
21st century education has changed beyond all recognition. Virtual teaching, flipped classrooms, AI, ungrading, collective syllabi and the teacher as learner are concepts that, for many traditionalists, are foreign terrain. The issues at play are multiple, varied and often polemic. In some instances, it results in calls for a ‘return’ to what is tried and trusted – tests, grades and rote learning. In others, there are
calls for more creative, critical and ‘evolved’ approaches – further pushing the boundaries of how we conceive knowledge and its application. In short, there are calls for ever newer schools of thought. This scenario applies across disciplines: in the design fields of architecture and graphics. In the fields
of art and design. In the STEM sector and the social sciences. In the disparate fields of health and business, or media and the creative industries. Despite the conflicting opinions at play, every discipline is seeing more inclusive pedagogy, inverted classrooms and an ever increasing emphasis on student agency. In this context, we have no choice but to assess how we think about school.
Central to this process is critical thinking. How do students learn to be critical – and what does it mean to be critical of teaching? Are the methods we use to communicate knowledge relevant today? Do
they engage the modern student, visual learners and the social media generation? While communication is a celebrated core skill in the humanities, and representation is central to disciplinary practice in the arts and design, communication and representation methods in teaching – our modes of delivery – still often go unexamined. Aiming to explore these broad and interrelated issues, the papers brought together in this publication are diverse, helping us to better understand the new, emerging, evolving and established schools of thought in contemporary education.
calls for more creative, critical and ‘evolved’ approaches – further pushing the boundaries of how we conceive knowledge and its application. In short, there are calls for ever newer schools of thought. This scenario applies across disciplines: in the design fields of architecture and graphics. In the fields
of art and design. In the STEM sector and the social sciences. In the disparate fields of health and business, or media and the creative industries. Despite the conflicting opinions at play, every discipline is seeing more inclusive pedagogy, inverted classrooms and an ever increasing emphasis on student agency. In this context, we have no choice but to assess how we think about school.
Central to this process is critical thinking. How do students learn to be critical – and what does it mean to be critical of teaching? Are the methods we use to communicate knowledge relevant today? Do
they engage the modern student, visual learners and the social media generation? While communication is a celebrated core skill in the humanities, and representation is central to disciplinary practice in the arts and design, communication and representation methods in teaching – our modes of delivery – still often go unexamined. Aiming to explore these broad and interrelated issues, the papers brought together in this publication are diverse, helping us to better understand the new, emerging, evolving and established schools of thought in contemporary education.
| Original language | Spanish (Chile) |
|---|---|
| Commissioning body | AMPS |
| Number of pages | 244 |
| Volume | 42.1 |
| Edition | AMPS |
| State | Published - Jan 2025 |
| Event | New Schools of Thought: Critical Thinking and Creative Teaching - California State University, Los Angeles, United States Duration: 8 Jan 2025 → 10 Jan 2025 https://amps-research.com/conference/schools-of-thought/ |
Publication series
| Name | AMPS Proceedings Series |
|---|---|
| Volume | 42.1 |
| ISSN (Print) | 2398-9467 |
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver