TY - JOUR
T1 - Modified Camitz versus flexor digitorum superficialis of the fourth finger opponensplasty in severe carpal tunnel syndrome
T2 - A systematic review
AU - Kuroiwa, Tomoyuki
AU - Velasquez Garcia, Ausberto
AU - Iida, Naoya
AU - Hsu, Kai lan
AU - Selim, Omar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 SFCM
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background: Several opponensplasty techniques have been employed to address thenar muscle atrophy associated with severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Although modified Camitz opponensplasty (MCO) using the palmaris longus (PL) tendon is widely used by hand surgeons, alternative tendon transfer donors have been proposed, such as opponensplasty using the flexor digitorum superficialis of the ring finger (OF4). However, it is unclear which surgical technique provides superior outcomes. Hence, this systematic review aims to examine the difference in functional outcomes between MCO and OF4 for restoring thumb opposition in advanced CTS. Methods: A systematic search using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed. English-language articles reporting outcomes of opponensplasty for carpal tunnel syndrome were only included. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in clinical outcomes. Results: 301 studies were identified and only 8 eligible studies were collected and reviewed. In both groups, the postoperative outcomes were better than the preoperative ones. Among the outcomes that could be directly compared between groups, no clear differences were found. Conclusion: Although both surgeries can provide good thumb opposition, the choice of opponensplasty technique should be based on the surgeon's experience and preference unless being performed on a patient with congenital PL tendon deficiency.
AB - Background: Several opponensplasty techniques have been employed to address thenar muscle atrophy associated with severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Although modified Camitz opponensplasty (MCO) using the palmaris longus (PL) tendon is widely used by hand surgeons, alternative tendon transfer donors have been proposed, such as opponensplasty using the flexor digitorum superficialis of the ring finger (OF4). However, it is unclear which surgical technique provides superior outcomes. Hence, this systematic review aims to examine the difference in functional outcomes between MCO and OF4 for restoring thumb opposition in advanced CTS. Methods: A systematic search using PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus was performed. English-language articles reporting outcomes of opponensplasty for carpal tunnel syndrome were only included. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in clinical outcomes. Results: 301 studies were identified and only 8 eligible studies were collected and reviewed. In both groups, the postoperative outcomes were better than the preoperative ones. Among the outcomes that could be directly compared between groups, no clear differences were found. Conclusion: Although both surgeries can provide good thumb opposition, the choice of opponensplasty technique should be based on the surgeon's experience and preference unless being performed on a patient with congenital PL tendon deficiency.
KW - BRAND procedure
KW - Carpal tunnel syndrome
KW - Modified Camitz procedure
KW - Opponensplasty
KW - Systematic review
KW - Tendon transfer
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023373614
U2 - 10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102540
DO - 10.1016/j.hansur.2025.102540
M3 - Review article
C2 - 41275969
AN - SCOPUS:105023373614
SN - 2468-1229
JO - Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation
JF - Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation
M1 - 102540
ER -