Medios y memoria en Chile: análisis comparativo del framing mediático en los funerales de Patricio Aylwin y Carlos Altamirano

Translated title of the contribution: Media and Memory in Chile: Comparative Analysis of Media Framing in the Funerals of Patricio Aylwin and Carlos Altamirano

Francisco Javier Tagle Montt, Vanessa Zúñiga Rodríguez, José Tomás Hargous Fuentes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Media outlets, through their own mediating dynamics, have gradually transformed into true agents of society’s memory. Following the deaths of former president Patricio Aylwin in 2016 and former socialist senator Carlos Altamirano in 2019—both pivotal political figures in Chile’s recent history—this research posits that the written press constructed a memory framed within two media narratives: Funerary Rite and Democratic Legacy. For this purpose, El Mercurio de Santiago and La Tercera were chosen as case studies, as both were significant political actors, opposing the Unidad Popular government, supportive of the Military Regime, and functioning within contemporary democracy. Through an inductive method and qualitative discourse analysis, it is concluded that, with their ideological characteristics and varied political stances in the past, the Chilean press promoted a memory that used these deaths to endorse normative lessons on the ideal conduct of politics within Chile’s current democracy.

Translated title of the contributionMedia and Memory in Chile: Comparative Analysis of Media Framing in the Funerals of Patricio Aylwin and Carlos Altamirano
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)473-490
Number of pages18
JournalMemoria y Civilizacion
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Media and Memory in Chile: Comparative Analysis of Media Framing in the Funerals of Patricio Aylwin and Carlos Altamirano'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this