loS alcanceS Del examen De aDmiSibiliDaD De la DemanDa colectiva y el Derecho De DeFenSa De laS ParteS

Maite Aguirrezabal-Grünstein

doi:10.32995/S0718-80722024944

loS alcanceS Del examen De aDmiSibiliDaD De la DemanDa colectiva y el Derecho De DeFenSa De laS ParteS

Translated title of the contribution: The scope of the admiss ibility examination of the claSS action anD the right oF DeFence oF the PartieS

Maite Aguirrezabal-Grünstein^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This paper analyzes the judgment issued by the Supreme Court dated October 1, 2024, in case number 20,625-2024 entitled “Conadecus vs. Santander Consumer Finance and others”, referring to the requirements that a class action lawsuit must meet to be declared admissible, and the scope of the examination of its admissibility and its effects on the parties’ right of defense.

Translated title of the contribution	The scope of the admiss ibility examination of the claSS action anD the right oF DeFence oF the PartieS
Original language	Spanish
Pages (from-to)	305-318
Number of pages	14
Journal	Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado
Issue number	43
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.32995/S0718-80722024944
State	Published - Dec 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Universidad Diego Portales. All rights reserved.

Access to Document

10.32995/S0718-80722024944

Cite this

@article{9f68c9b4b10e43abbd2d4d39cd80a702,

title = "loS alcanceS Del examen De aDmiSibiliDaD De la DemanDa colectiva y el Derecho De DeFenSa De laS ParteS",

abstract = "This paper analyzes the judgment issued by the Supreme Court dated October 1, 2024, in case number 20,625-2024 entitled “Conadecus vs. Santander Consumer Finance and others”, referring to the requirements that a class action lawsuit must meet to be declared admissible, and the scope of the examination of its admissibility and its effects on the parties{\textquoteright} right of defense.",

keywords = "admissibility, defense, scope",

author = "Maite Aguirrezabal-Gr{\"u}nstein",

year = "2024",

month = dec,

doi = "10.32995/S0718-80722024944",

language = "Spanish",

pages = "305--318",

journal = "Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado",

issn = "0718-0233",

publisher = "Universidad Diego Portales",

number = "43",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - loS alcanceS Del examen De aDmiSibiliDaD De la DemanDa colectiva y el Derecho De DeFenSa De laS ParteS

AU - Aguirrezabal-Grünstein, Maite

PY - 2024/12

Y1 - 2024/12

N2 - This paper analyzes the judgment issued by the Supreme Court dated October 1, 2024, in case number 20,625-2024 entitled “Conadecus vs. Santander Consumer Finance and others”, referring to the requirements that a class action lawsuit must meet to be declared admissible, and the scope of the examination of its admissibility and its effects on the parties’ right of defense.

AB - This paper analyzes the judgment issued by the Supreme Court dated October 1, 2024, in case number 20,625-2024 entitled “Conadecus vs. Santander Consumer Finance and others”, referring to the requirements that a class action lawsuit must meet to be declared admissible, and the scope of the examination of its admissibility and its effects on the parties’ right of defense.

KW - admissibility

KW - defense

KW - scope

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105014457675

U2 - 10.32995/S0718-80722024944

DO - 10.32995/S0718-80722024944

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:105014457675

SN - 0718-0233

SP - 305

EP - 318

JO - Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado

JF - Revista Chilena de Derecho Privado

IS - 43

ER -

loS alcanceS Del examen De aDmiSibiliDaD De la DemanDa colectiva y el Derecho De DeFenSa De laS ParteS

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this