Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

LA PROTECCIÓN CONSTITUCIONAL DE LOS BIENES INCORPORALES EN CHILE Y EL PROBLEMA DE SU DETERMINACIÓN EN LOS CONTRATOS ENTRE PRIVADOS

Translated title of the contribution: The constitutional protection of intangible assets in Chile and the problem of their determination in contracts between private parties
  • Francisco Medina Krause*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Despite all the doubts surrounding the “proprietaryization of rights”, in Chile there seems to be a basic consensus: goods of an incorporeal nature can be constitutionally guaranteed through the right of property. Property over rights. This has been demonstrated by national jurisprudence for more than three decades, under the auspices of a doctrinal discussion that prefers to discuss the scope of this legal technique, rather than question its foundations. However, a key question persists in the development of property ownership in Chile and in the scope of its constitutional recognition: what, exactly, is an incorporeal good? Until the answer to this question reaches agreement, it will be difficult to advance on other topics of interest on the subject, so its clarification becomes a priority. Thus, after a brief historical, doctrinal and jurisprudential review, in this work we propose some guiding criteria in the elucidation of the question posed.

Translated title of the contributionThe constitutional protection of intangible assets in Chile and the problem of their determination in contracts between private parties
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)355-396
Number of pages42
JournalRevista de Derecho Politico
Volume122
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Universidad Nacional de Educacion a Distancia (UNED). All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The constitutional protection of intangible assets in Chile and the problem of their determination in contracts between private parties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this