La más verdadera tragedia: conciliación y antagonismo en las Leyes de Platón

Translated title of the contribution: The Truest Tragedy: Conciliation and Antagonism in Plato’s Laws

José Antonio Giménez Salinas*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper examines the quarrel with the tragic poets in Laws, VII 817b-d, by emphasizing, on the one hand, fundamental differences with the more famous quarrel of the Republic, and by arguing, on the other hand, for a strong (and not merely rhetorical) reading of the central claim of the passage, namely, that the very political constitution proposed in the dialogue is itself the “truest tragedy.” Assuming this perspective, I show that the constitution of Magnesia is the best possible tragedy insofar as it makes possible the greatest realization of the community’s life, recognizing, appealing to, and integrating human passions and weaknesses within itself. We are confronted with a notion of tragedy that, while recognizing as its starting point the antagonism proper to the tragic genre, aspires to common happiness as the most beautiful culmination of the human drama.

Translated title of the contributionThe Truest Tragedy: Conciliation and Antagonism in Plato’s Laws
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)11-39
Number of pages29
JournalTopicos (Mexico)
Issue number72
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Universidad Panamericana. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Truest Tragedy: Conciliation and Antagonism in Plato’s Laws'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this