La ética de Aristóteles en la evolución de la culpa jurídica. Una revisión a propósito de la previsibilidad

Translated title of the contribution: Aristotle⇔s ethics in the evolution of the legal negligence: A review about foreseeability

Sonia Inostroza Adasme*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

In the 4th century BC, Aristotle addressed the difference between (Greek passag) (negligence) and (Greek passag) (wrongdoing). Consequently, he distinguishes between voluntary and involuntary acts so as to arrive at such reasoning 200 years before Roman jurists did. Although it is true that it is not possible to affirm an equivalent relationship between negligence, as it was conceived in the Greek world, with the thought of Roman jurisconsultants, it is possible to find the trace, the germ or essence of strict negligence, particularly in the treatment of involuntary acts.

Translated title of the contributionAristotle⇔s ethics in the evolution of the legal negligence: A review about foreseeability
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)421-442
Number of pages22
JournalProblema
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Aristotle⇔s ethics in the evolution of the legal negligence: A review about foreseeability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this