Justificación y exculpación en tensión: sobre la extrema necesidad a propósito del caso de Jodie y Mary1

Translated title of the contribution: Justification and Excuse in Tension: on the Extreme Necessity Regarding the Case of Jodie and Mary

Rodrigo Andrés Guerra Espinosa*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents a legal-criminal philosophical analyses on the extreme necessity regarding the conjoined twins Jodie and Mary. Thus, to begin with, we will describe the content of the state of necessity in life-threatening situations. Secondly, we will offer a solution which we consider to be adequate to illustrate the axiological debates on the criteria of proportionality between the evil to be avoided and the evil caused. At last, we will look at the presumptions of the case of the conjoined twins as well as some lines of argument that justify or excuse their separation, arguing that there are good reasons to adopt the principle of double effect in these scenarios.

Translated title of the contributionJustification and Excuse in Tension: on the Extreme Necessity Regarding the Case of Jodie and Mary
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)303-331
Number of pages29
JournalProblema
Issue number18
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • double effect
  • ethics
  • life-threatening
  • moral dilemma
  • state of necessity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Justification and Excuse in Tension: on the Extreme Necessity Regarding the Case of Jodie and Mary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this