Juan Díaz de Solís y el descubrimiento del Río de la Plata. Diálogos y discusiones transnacionales para la elaboración de un relato histórico oficial en el Cono Sur (1860-1900)

Translated title of the contribution: Juan Díaz de Solís and the Discovery of the Río de la Plata. Transnational Dialogues and Discussions for the Elaboration of an Official Historical Narrative in the Southern Cone (1860-1900)

Nicolás Arenas Deleón*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article examines the process of construction of the official historical narrative around the figure of the sailor Juan Díaz de Solís during the second half of the nineteenth century. The analysis of the dialogues and controversies that took place between different actors in the literate community at the regional level (Southern Cone) aims to reveal the different ways of interpreting the past and the heterogeneous strategies used to present them to public opinion, as well as to understand how these exchanges placed the manner in which the practice of the historical discipline itself was conceived at the center of the debate. In this way, the functioning of complex intellectual networks that served for the circulation of historical knowledge and the elaboration of discourses that attempted to elucidate this and other events related to the American colonial past is exposed.

Translated title of the contributionJuan Díaz de Solís and the Discovery of the Río de la Plata. Transnational Dialogues and Discussions for the Elaboration of an Official Historical Narrative in the Southern Cone (1860-1900)
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)46-74
Number of pages29
JournalCo-herencia
Volume20
Issue number39
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Universidad EAFIT. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Juan Díaz de Solís and the Discovery of the Río de la Plata. Transnational Dialogues and Discussions for the Elaboration of an Official Historical Narrative in the Southern Cone (1860-1900)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this