Abstract
In the discussion of Moral Intellectualism in the Protagoras, attention is not usually paid to how the narrative construction guides and complements the philosophical argument. In this article, I analyze the Section of Hippocrates (310a–314c) and argue that it provides a relevant guidance for the interpretation of Moral Intellectualism. In this passage, the idea of Moral Knowledge is introduced, but it is constructed as one (i) different from technical-productive knowledge, (ii) that cannot be reduced to definitional knowledge, and, furthermore, (iii) that cannot be taught without require a certain type of particular disposition of the learner. I argue these points using an analysis of three moments: the distinction that Socrates introduces between professional and general knowledge; the comparison of the sophist with the merchant; and the contradictory decision to go see Protagoras.
| Translated title of the contribution | Moral Intellectualism in The Light of Protagoras 310a–314c |
|---|---|
| Original language | Spanish |
| Pages (from-to) | 185-213 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Eidos |
| Volume | 2025 |
| Issue number | 43 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025, Universidad del Norte. All rights reserved.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Moral Intellectualism in The Light of Protagoras 310a–314c'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver